CENTER FOR LOWELL HISTORY – UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL LIBRARIES

Home     Digital Photographs     Genealogy Resources     Special Collections     Search
 
INSTITUTE FOR ASIAN AMERICAN STUDIES
 
4
  
may soon be able to afford them [workers] the increased compensation their industry so well deserves."12 Mill owners thus expressed a desire to overcome the economic hard times 
with the existing workforce. By now they had clearly decided against the idea of resorting to Chinese immigrants as "cheap labor source," 
the method tried by Calvin Sampson in North Adams in 1870. As one scholar who studied Sampson's experiment with Chinese workers concluded, by 1876 capitalists had found "the competition of Chinese manufacturing firms 
as unpleasant as the competition of coolie 
labor had become to the American working-
men." Both the Republican and Democratic parties cried for Chinese exclusion in the 1876 presidential election. 13
     When the Chinese Exclusion bill was 
being voted on in the U.S. Congress in March 1882, several Lowell newspapers voiced their opinions. The Republican Lowell Daily Courier noted, "If China were a little country, with the chance of only a few thousand of her people coming here, and they only for a temporary purpose, we might be as lofty about `the open hospitality of our shores' as we pleased .... 
Self preservation is a law precedent to hospi-
tality . . . . When we are ready to allow the Chinaman equal privileges of citizenship with others, and can say that we are willing to abide the chances of having him come over and out-
vote us and Celestialize our American govern-
ment, we may give him the freedom of the country. And if we cannot afford to do that we had better let him stay where he is."14
     According to the Courier - which was not 
as concerned about the Chinese as a source of cheap labor the Chinese were still the 
"other." Racism under girded its basic assumption that Chinese could not be assimi-
lated. So, although the same paper referred to
  
  
the two Chinese men in Lowell as well-
behaved and "worthy the respect and protec-
tion of our citizens," racial and cultural preju-
dice led to fears of Lowell being overrun by Chinese. 15
     Not surprisingly, the Lowell Weekly Sun, a Democratic paper representing Irish 
Americans in Lowell, joined the capitalists in expressing the racially prejudiced assumption that the culture of "the [white] American peo-
ple" was the superior kind and that "the 
Chinese who have come to this country have not assimilated" with it "and show no disposi-
tion to do so." On behalf of Lowell's workers, the Sun also expressed fears of their having to compete with Chinese labor. The Sun asserted that "Chinese work for low wages is really a reason for rendering their coming all the 
more undesirable, as American civilization requires for its maintenance a high rate of wages."16 For the preservation of "the [white] American people," the Chinese should be excluded.
     The Saturday Vox Populi was another Republican paper, but claiming to represent 
the voice of the people. It defended the 
Chinese Exclusion bill as "a good one" with 
no "injustice in it." This paper held that, "Our nation has just as much right to say who shall come here and sojourn with us, as the owner 
of a farm has to decide who shall pasture it, or 
a city as to what branches of business shall not be carried on in its borders." 17
     The only dissenting voice in Lowell came from The Morning Mail, which claimed not to 
be "the organ of any party or individual."18 It observed that it was beyond comprehension that "any lover of equal rights can war upon 
the Chinamen who were the last to accept the long standing invitation, extended to all 
nations to come to our shores and enjoy the

 
Shehong Chen

[Top Of Page] Previous Page or Next Page